lighthouse
09-07-2007, 11:27 AM
Overall, I thought they did an OK job with some work to do. The late hit on the UL offensive lineman should have been a no call, it was clear the MTSU player pushed him into the UL player. I wonder sometimes why they don't see those.
I disagreed with the announcers on the personal foul on Urrutia. They said the MTSU player had a late hit first. He did come in late, but the UL back didn't have complete control of the ball as he crossed the goal line, but got control just before he hit the ground. The official saw that and passed on the late hit. IMO, that was a good no-call. It was clear Urritia pushed the MTSU player.
There were a couple holds they missed, but on both teams. Also, one of the hits on Braum was real close to a late hit.
UL uses the pick real good when they line up with the tight ends on the same side, and the WR goes to the middle. One was really obvious. That doesn't get called much.
What's your opinion?
I disagreed with the announcers on the personal foul on Urrutia. They said the MTSU player had a late hit first. He did come in late, but the UL back didn't have complete control of the ball as he crossed the goal line, but got control just before he hit the ground. The official saw that and passed on the late hit. IMO, that was a good no-call. It was clear Urritia pushed the MTSU player.
There were a couple holds they missed, but on both teams. Also, one of the hits on Braum was real close to a late hit.
UL uses the pick real good when they line up with the tight ends on the same side, and the WR goes to the middle. One was really obvious. That doesn't get called much.
What's your opinion?
