Koshwal

[audacious1]

I haven't heard much chatter about this solid player but both Rivals and Scout have him listing Kentucky, among others. But with the amount of available PT at Kentucky next season and beyond... it's



Nayal "Mac" Koshwal (6'8" 240, Chicago, IL)

http://scout.scout.com/a.z?s=75&p=8&c=1&nid=1610800

http://basketballrecruiting.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?pr_key=30997&Sport=2

[Chunks06]

Tre Pryor wrote: I haven't heard much chatter about this solid player but both Rivals and Scout have him listing Kentucky, among others. But with the amount of available PT at Kentucky next season and beyond... it's



Nayal "Mac" Koshwal (6'8" 240, Chicago, IL)

http://scout.scout.com/a.z?s=75&p=8&c=1&nid=1610800

http://basketballrecruiting.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?pr_key=30997&Sport=2









I read the article on rivals a couple of days ago. Direct quote in there about concern over our style of play not allowing him to showcase his skills. In other words, it doesnt look good.

[Buddah]

Chunks06 wrote: Tre Pryor wrote: I haven't heard much chatter about this solid player but both Rivals and Scout have him listing Kentucky, among others. But with the amount of available PT at Kentucky next season and beyond... it's



Nayal "Mac" Koshwal (6'8" 240, Chicago, IL)

http://scout.scout.com/a.z?s=75&p=8&c=1&nid=1610800

http://basketballrecruiting.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?pr_key=30997&Sport=2









I read the article on rivals a couple of days ago. Direct quote in there about concern over our style of play not allowing him to showcase his skills. In other words, it doesnt look good.


yep you are correct. dove tails with what i have said since the style of play arugement has been brought forth.. he listed his six schools to visit and we weren't on it...

[Buddah]

http://story.scout.com/a.z?s=169&p=2&c=560426&ssf=1&RequestedURL=http%3a% 2f%2fstory.scout.com%2fa.z%3fs%3d169%26p%3d2%26c%3 d560426



this article talks about his visits, and uk isn;t on it.. yes you have to have a subscription.

[Stonewall]

Buddah wrote: http://story.scout.com/a.z?s=169&p=2&c=560426&ssf=1&RequestedURL=http%3a% 2f%2fstory.scout.com%2fa.z%3fs%3d169%26p%3d2%26c%3 d560426



this article talks about his visits, and uk isn;t on it.. yes you have to have a subscription.

So we can take his name off of the list. But we still have a shot at Patterson so losing this one doesn't really matter. Right?

I say lose, we didn't lose him, we never had a shot at him.

[Chunks06]

Stonewall wrote: Buddah wrote: http://story.scout.com/a.z?s=169&p=2&c=560426&ssf=1&RequestedURL=http%3a% 2f%2fstory.scout.com%2fa.z%3fs%3d169%26p%3d2%26c%3 d560426



this article talks about his visits, and uk isn;t on it.. yes you have to have a subscription.

So we can take his name off of the list. But we still have a shot at Patterson so losing this one doesn't really matter. Right?

I say lose, we didn't lose him, we never had a shot at him.

The way people talk about this kid. I would say he might have been as vital as Patterson. I wouldnt doubt if we find out because he could very well end up down the road at the trash dump.